Login | DPI Staff queries on depositing or searching to era.daf.qld.gov.au

Evaluating novel biodegradable polymer matrix fertilizers for nitrogen-efficient agriculture

Share this record

Add to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to XAdd to WechatAdd to Microsoft_teamsAdd to WhatsappAdd to Any

Export this record

View Altmetrics

Witt, T., Robinson, N., Palma, A. C., Cernusak, L. A., Pratt, S., Redding, M. R., Batstone, D. J., Schmidt, S. and Laycock, B. (2024) Evaluating novel biodegradable polymer matrix fertilizers for nitrogen-efficient agriculture. Journal of Environmental Quality, 53 (3). pp. 287-299. ISSN 0047-2425

[img]
Preview
PDF
1MB

Article Link: https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20552

Publisher URL: https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jeq2.20552

Abstract

Enhanced efficiency fertilizers (EEFs) can reduce nitrogen (N) losses in temperate agriculture but are less effective in the tropics. We aimed to design a new EEF and evaluate their performance in simple-to-complex tests with tropical soils and crops. We melt-extruded urea at different loadings into biodegradable polymer matrix composites using biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) or polybutylene adipate-co-terephthalate (PBAT) polymers with urea distributed throughout the pellet. These contrast with commercially coated EEF that have a polymer-coated urea core. We hypothesized that matrix fertilizers would have an intermediate N release rate compared to fast release from urea or slow release from coated EEF. Nitrogen release rates in water and sand–soil columns confirmed that the matrix fertilizer formulations had a more progressive N release than a coated EEF. A more complex picture emerged from testing sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] grown to maturity in large soil pots, as the different formulations resulted in minor differences in plant N accumulation and grain production. This confirms the need to consider soil interactions, microbial processes, crop physiology, and phenology for evaluating fertilizer performance. Promisingly, crop δ15N signatures emerged as an integrated measure of efficacy, tracking likely N conversions and losses. The three complementary evaluations combine the advantages of standardized high-throughput screening and more resource-intensive and realistic testing in a plant-soil system. We conclude that melt-blended biodegradable polymer matrix fertilizers show promise as EEF because they can be designed toward more abiotically or more microbially driven N release by selecting biopolymer type and N loading rate.

Item Type:Article
Corporate Creators:Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Queensland
Business groups:Animal Science
Subjects:Agriculture > Agriculture (General) > Agriculture and the environment
Agriculture > Agriculture (General) > Soils. Soil science
Agriculture > Agriculture (General) > Agricultural meteorology. Crops and climate
Agriculture > Agriculture (General) > Methods and systems of culture. Cropping systems
Agriculture > Agriculture (General) > Improvement, reclamation, fertilisation, irrigation etc., of lands (Melioration)
Live Archive:12 Mar 2024 22:46
Last Modified:10 Jul 2024 05:17

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics