eRA Home || About || Browse || Search || Help
Login | DPI Staff queries on depositing or searching to era.dpi.qld.gov.au

Phosphorus sorption and phosphorus requirements of major tobacco soils in north Queensland

Export / Share

Share this record

Add to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to XAdd to WechatAdd to Microsoft_teamsAdd to WhatsappAdd to Any

Export this record

Moody, P.W. and Tonello, P.E. (1981) Phosphorus sorption and phosphorus requirements of major tobacco soils in north Queensland. Queensland Journal of Agricultural and Animal Sciences, 38 (1). pp. 21-27.

[thumbnail of QJAAS_38[1]_1981_pp21-27_moody&tonello.pdf]
Preview
 PDF
466kB

Abstract

From phosphorus sorption curves a supernatant solution phosphorus concentration of 0.11 ppm corresponded to 90% maximum yield of field-grown tobacco. Nineteen virgin sites in the Mareeba-Dimbulah area were sampled to cover the range of major tobacco soils.

Item Type:Article
Corporate Creators:Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Queensland
Subjects:Agriculture > Agriculture (General) > Soils. Soil science > Soil and crops. Soil-plant relationships. Soil productivity
Plant culture > Field crops > Other field crops
Live Archive:06 Mar 2024 03:39
Last Modified:06 Mar 2024 03:39

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Download Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

© The State of Queensland (Department of Primary Industries). Queensland Government

Home | Copyright | Disclaimer | Privacy

Site Administrator: RIS.Enquiries@dpi.qld.gov.au

Aboriginal people and Torres Strait Islander people are advised the journals and articles on this site may contain images or names of deceased persons in photographs or printed material. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander material and information accessed on this site may be culturally sensitive for some individuals and communities. Some material may contain language, terms, or descriptions that reflect the authors' views, or those of the period in which the item was written and may be considered inappropriate today. These views are not necessarily the views of the Department.  While the information may not reflect current understandings, it is provided in an historical context.