Login | DPI Staff queries on depositing or searching to era@dpi.qld.gov.au

Weed management in Australian cotton. Our Past and Our Future

Share this record

Add to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to XAdd to WechatAdd to Microsoft_teamsAdd to WhatsappAdd to Any

Export this record

Werth, J. A., Koetz, E. and Thornby, D. (2026) Weed management in Australian cotton. Our Past and Our Future. In: 24th Australasian Weeds Conference; Collaboration across borders: Sharing knowledge for effective weed management, 23-27 August 2026, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Full text not currently attached. Access may be available via the Publisher's website or OpenAccess link.

Abstract

Before the introduction of herbicide tolerant cotton varieties, weed management in Australian cotton systems was heavily reliant on combinations of residual herbicides before and at planting and in-crop. Options for post-emergent herbicides were limited, and in-crop weed control was via chipping and cultivation. Glyphosate tolerant cotton was introduced in 2000, and within a few years season-long tolerance was achieved. This resulted in extensive reductions in residual herbicides and chipping and a shift to heavy reliance on glyphosate. Subsequently, glyphosate resistance became prevalent in grass weeds, and later in broadleaf weeds. As a result, researchers and industry developed an industry wide herbicide resistance management strategy (HRMS). The HRMS focused on a relatively simple 2+2+0 approach (two non-glyphosate tactics in crop + two non-glyphosate tactics in fallow + allowing zero survivors to set seed). This approach facilitated the ability to re-introduce residual herbicides into the program. However, limited knowledge of the next generation of growers on how to introduce residual herbicides into the system, while minimizing the crop impacts resulted in a concerted effort by the industry to educate growers on how best to do this. Recently, cotton varieties were introduced with tolerance to glyphosate, dicamba and glufosinate. The industry now has widespread glyphosate resistance to a number of grass and broadleaf weeds. In addition, resistance to group 1, 4 and 22 herbicides is also common. This created a need for an updated HRMS aimed at minimising resistance across all herbicides. The backbone of the HRMS is to apply six different modes of action on grasses and broadleaves every two years and allow no survivors to set seed. This is a more complex approach than the 2+2+0, however extensive modelling has shown this to be an effective long-term approach. At least until further herbicide resistance challenges or herbicide tolerant technologies arrive.

Item Type:Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Corporate Creators:Department of Primary Industries, Queensland
Business groups:Crop and Food Science
Additional Information:DPI Authors: Jeff Werth
Keywords:Weed management, Cotton, Herbicides
Subjects:Science > Invasive Species > Plants > Effect of herbicides
Plant pests and diseases > Weeds, parasitic plants etc
Live Archive:20 Oct 2026 01:17
Last Modified:20 Oct 2026 01:17

Repository Staff Only: item control page