Login | DPI Staff queries on depositing or searching to era.dpi.qld.gov.au

Impacts of grazing management on biocrust microbiomes and their potential to input and cycle nutrients

Share this record

Add to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to XAdd to WechatAdd to Microsoft_teamsAdd to WhatsappAdd to Any

Export this record

Cofre, M. V., Sun, J., Williams, W., Lyons, R., O’Reagain, P., Schmidt, S. and Dennis, P. G. (2025) Impacts of grazing management on biocrust microbiomes and their potential to input and cycle nutrients. Biology and Fertility of Soils . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-025-01963-9

Full text not currently attached. Access may be available via the Publisher's website or OpenAccess link.

Article Link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-025-01963-9

Abstract

Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are key components of dryland ecosystems, hosting diverse microbial communities that mediate ecosystem services. In grazed drylands, biocrusts help replenish nitrogen (N) incorporated into livestock; hence, it is important to understand how grazing management affects them. We used shotgun metagenomics to investigate the impacts of four grazing treatments – (1) non-grazed, (2) moderately stocked, (3) heavily stocked, and (4) moderately stocked with wet season rotational spelling (cattle removed every 3–4 years) – on the diversity and potential function of biocrust bacterial communities in two distinct land types (Ironbark and Box) within a northeast Australian semi-arid tropical savanna. Grazing significantly influenced taxonomic and functional gene profiles and reduced biocrust cover, although these effects differed between land types. In Ironbark, the effect of moderate stocking on community composition was intermediate between the non-grazed control and heavy stocking treatments, while in Box it more closely resembled the heavy stocking rate. Rotational spelling had negligible impacts on biocrust bacterial diversity and potential function but mitigated the negative impacts of grazing on biocrust cover, particularly in Box. At the genetic level, we identified diverse bacterial lineages potentially capable of N fixation and similar relative frequencies of N fixing genes between grazing treatments. Hence, to maximise N inputs, rangeland managers should reduce biocrust losses. Our findings indicate that the frequency and duration of rotational spelling should be explored as a promising approach to mitigate the negative impacts of grazing on biocrust cover to maximize the capacity of biocrusts to replenish N.

Item Type:Article
Corporate Creators:Department of Primary Industries, Queensland
Business groups:Animal Science
Additional Information:DPI Author: Peter O'Reagain
Keywords:drylands; Rangelands; Nitrogen fixation; Nutrient cycling; Microbiome
Subjects:Agriculture > Agriculture (General) > Agricultural ecology (General)
Agriculture > Agriculture (General) > Agriculture and the environment
Animal culture > Cattle
Animal culture > Rangelands. Range management. Grazing
Live Archive:19 Dec 2025 03:50
Last Modified:19 Dec 2025 03:50

Repository Staff Only: item control page