Login | DPI Staff queries on depositing or searching to era.dpi.qld.gov.au

The effect of a commercial probiotic product on the milk quality of dairy cows

Share this record

Add to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to XAdd to WechatAdd to Microsoft_teamsAdd to WhatsappAdd to Any

Export this record

View Altmetrics

Olchowy, T.W.J., Soust, M. and Alawneh, J. I. (2019) The effect of a commercial probiotic product on the milk quality of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 102 (3). pp. 2188-2195. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15411

[thumbnail of The effect of a commercial probiotic product on the milk quality of dairy cows.pdf]
Preview
PDF
233kB

Article Link: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15411

Abstract

Probiotics intended to improve plant health and productivity of pastures grazed by dairy cow are becoming commercially available in Australia. Great Land (GL; Terragen Biotech Pty Ltd., Coolum Beach, QLD, Australia) is one such biologic soil conditioner and spray-on probiotic with a label claim of “acting to improve plant health and productivity.” The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of GL on the milk quality of cows grazing pasture top-dressed with GL. Lactating dairy cows of mixed age and breed (primarily Holstein-Friesian), in their second lactation or greater, and at least 80 d in milk were enrolled and randomly allocated into 1 of 2 study groups: a treatment cow group (n = 98; cows grazed pasture that was top-dressed with GL according to the product label) and a control cow group (n = 114; cows grazed untreated pasture). As required, both groups were supplemented at the same rate with a mixed ration during the grazing period. Composite milk samples were collected weekly from each cow during the study and analyzed to determine milk components. Milk volumes were recorded at each milking using the herd management software of the study farm. Mean differences in the milk component variables were compared using mixed-effects linear regression models. After controlling for the effect of days in milk, cow lactation, and time since a cow entered the study, the treatment cows produced an average of 1.21 L/cow per day more milk (95% confidence interval: 0.34–2.08 L/cow per day) and more milk protein (0.03 kg/d; 95% confidence interval: 0.01–0.05 kg/d) than the control cows. Pasture cover and pasture consumption did not differ between the GL-treated and the untreated study paddocks grazed by the treatment or control cows. A limited amount of published data have examined the effect of probiotic pasture treatment on the milk quality of dairy cows. This study suggests that application of such products may be beneficial. The mechanisms associated with this type of outcome remain to be investigated. © 2019 American Dairy Science Association

Item Type:Article
Corporate Creators:Department of Primary Industries, Queensland
Business groups:Biosecurity Queensland
Subjects:Animal culture > Cattle
Animal culture > Cattle > Dairy processing. Dairy products
Live Archive:05 Sep 2025 01:48
Last Modified:05 Sep 2025 01:48

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics