eRA Home || About || Browse || Search || Help
Login | DPI Staff queries on depositing or searching to era.dpi.qld.gov.au

Comparison of controlled droplet and conventional application of postemergence herbicides

Export / Share

Share this record

Add to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to XAdd to WechatAdd to Microsoft_teamsAdd to WhatsappAdd to Any

Export this record

Walker, S.R. (1986) Comparison of controlled droplet and conventional application of postemergence herbicides. Queensland Journal of Agricultural and Animal Sciences, 43 (2). pp. 135-139.

[thumbnail of QJAAS_43[2]_1986_pp135-139_walker.pdf]
Preview
 PDF
334kB

Abstract

Eleven field experiments were conducted at Kingaroy in south-eastern Queensland to compare the effectiveness of controlled droplet application (CDA) with a conventional hydraulic application system. The postemergence herbicides evaluated for broadleaf weed control in summer leguminous and cereal crops were acifluorfen,atrazine, bentazone, dicamba and dinoseb.

Item Type:Article
Corporate Creators:Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Queensland
Live Archive:20 Feb 2024 05:58
Last Modified:20 Feb 2024 05:58

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Download Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

© The State of Queensland (Department of Primary Industries). Queensland Government

Home | Copyright | Disclaimer | Privacy

Site Administrator: RIS.Enquiries@dpi.qld.gov.au

Aboriginal people and Torres Strait Islander people are advised the journals and articles on this site may contain images or names of deceased persons in photographs or printed material. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander material and information accessed on this site may be culturally sensitive for some individuals and communities. Some material may contain language, terms, or descriptions that reflect the authors' views, or those of the period in which the item was written and may be considered inappropriate today. These views are not necessarily the views of the Department.  While the information may not reflect current understandings, it is provided in an historical context.